Thoughts on version-based development, AI-assisted architecture, and why the old way of building software is broken.
MVPs create technical debt from day one. There's a better way—and it's faster and cheaper than you think. Learn why the MVP approach is broken and what version-based development offers instead.
I can build complete products in weeks instead of months. This should feel like a superpower. Instead, it feels like cheating. Here's why speed creates psychological discomfort—and why you need to push through it anyway.
What happens when you stop treating code as sacred and start treating it as a build artifact? Everything changes. The paradigm shift that makes technical debt disappear.
The timeline from idea to validated product collapsed from 6-12 months to 6-8 weeks. This isn't about building faster—it's about testing bolder ideas, pivoting without fear, and finding product-market fit before you run out of runway.
I don't code to explore anymore. I build complete experiments in hours to validate hypotheses. The experiments are disposable. The learning is permanent. And it transforms risky exploration into cheap validation.
I can rebuild a complete system faster than I can properly maintain it. When that's true, maintenance becomes obsolete. Here's why the entire practice of software maintenance is about to disappear.
Version-based development, why MVPs are broken, iterating on concepts not code.
How to architect systems that AI can generate correctly, at production quality.
Real projects, timelines, and results. What worked, what didn't, and what we learned.
System design, specifications as source of truth, code as disposable build artifact.
How to move fast without compromising quality. Building complete products in weeks.
The paradigm shift happening now. Why this matters for the future of software.
Stop reading about it. Let's talk about your specific project.
Book a Call